|
|
|
@ -5,15 +5,13 @@ dbot.changelog[2.0007] =
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
{ change = drlDbotChangeLogTypeMisc,
|
|
|
|
|
desc =
|
|
|
|
|
[[Adjusted set creation and analysis framework. It now supports using
|
|
|
|
|
separate equipment search "intensities" for a single set and for a
|
|
|
|
|
full analysis of 200 sets. This should give you the best possible
|
|
|
|
|
results for a single set while keeping the time to do a full analysis
|
|
|
|
|
more manageable. Also, the resolution of a full analysis is fairly
|
|
|
|
|
rough to begin with because it is dependent on stat bonus estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't make sense to try to squeeze every possible fraction of
|
|
|
|
|
a fraction of a percent out of the analysis when the original stat
|
|
|
|
|
assumptions could be off by 10% or more.]]
|
|
|
|
|
[[Adjusted set creation and analysis framework. It now supports using separate equipment search
|
|
|
|
|
"intensities" for a single set and for a full analysis of 200 sets. This should give
|
|
|
|
|
you the best possible results for a single set while keeping the time to do a full
|
|
|
|
|
analysis more manageable. Also, the resolution of a full analysis is fairly rough to
|
|
|
|
|
begin with because it is dependent on stat bonus estimates. It doesn't make sense to
|
|
|
|
|
try to squeeze every possible fraction of a fraction of a percent out of the analysis
|
|
|
|
|
when the original stat assumptions could be off by 10% or more.]]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|