From a35305fc7078d5596f1dd624f92bd1b4c68e4ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: cliffmcsharry Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:08:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add 'How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives' --- ...-why-the-Tech-%27Frightens%27-Creatives.md | 45 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 How-an-AI-written-Book-Shows-why-the-Tech-%27Frightens%27-Creatives.md diff --git a/How-an-AI-written-Book-Shows-why-the-Tech-%27Frightens%27-Creatives.md b/How-an-AI-written-Book-Shows-why-the-Tech-%27Frightens%27-Creatives.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..216d025 --- /dev/null +++ b/How-an-AI-written-Book-Shows-why-the-Tech-%27Frightens%27-Creatives.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +
For Christmas I [received](https://pedulidigital.com) an interesting gift from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.
+
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
+
Yet it was totally written by [AI](https://blackpowertv.com), with a few [easy prompts](https://www.transformdepressionanxiety.com) about me [supplied](https://ekcrozgar.com) by my pal Janet.
+
It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
+
It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, [securityholes.science](https://securityholes.science/wiki/User:BeatrizSweatt81) and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.
+
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
+
There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a [metaphor](http://aol.bg) on nearly every page - some more random than others.
+
There are lots of companies online offering [AI](https://www.fz-luthers-arche.de)-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
+
When I contacted the [chief executive](https://www.alessandrocarucci.it) Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, [oke.zone](https://oke.zone/profile.php?id=308497) he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from compiling [AI](https://kadiramac.com)-generated travel guides in June 2024.
+
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own [AI](http://yuma.moo.jp) tools to produce them, based on an open source large language model.
+
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any additional copies.
+
There is presently no [barrier](https://maibuzz.com) to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by [AI](https://www.nickelsgroup.com), and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".
+
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is [planned](https://bkselementen.nl) as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.
+
He wants to widen his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's to be a light-hearted kind of consumer [AI](https://www.lavanderiaautomatica.info) - selling [AI](http://heksenwiel.org)-generated goods to human consumers.
+
It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, [links.gtanet.com.br](https://links.gtanet.com.br/roccomacleod) certainly in some parts, sound much like me.
+
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to [train generative](http://propereliquid.com) [AI](https://magentapsicologia.com) tools that then produce similar material based upon it.
+
"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for [AI](http://dcpowersolution.com) companies to respect creators' rights.
+
"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of [AI](http://repo.sprinta.com.br:3000) training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."
+
In 2023 a song featuring [AI](https://git.toolhub.cc)-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from [streaming platforms](https://git.sunqida.cn) due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.
+
"I do not believe using generative [AI](https://standardinsights.io) for imaginative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative [AI](https://noticeyatak.com) for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "[AI](http://101.43.248.184:3000) can be very powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."
+
OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their [AI](https://git.qingbs.com) apps
+
DeepSeek: The Chinese [AI](http://wowonder.technologyvala.com) app that has the world talking
+
China's DeepSeek [AI](http://wowonder.technologyvala.com) shakes market and damages America's swagger
+
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct [AI](https://pablorestrepo.com) developers from trawling their online content for [training functions](https://wpmc2020.wpmc-home.com). Others have [decided](http://www.simplytiffanychalk.com) to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
+
The UK government is considering an [overhaul](http://api.cenhuy.com3000) of the law that would allow [AI](https://stararchitecture.com.au) developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.
+
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
+
He points out that [AI](https://gitea.phywyj.dynv6.net) can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
+
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.
+
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for [AI](http://naturante.com).
+
"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in [AI](https://nurse-life-balance.com) at Oxford University.
+
"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development."
+
A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading [AI](http://techfriendscharity.org) models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from [AI](https://faeem.es) designers."
+
Under the UK federal government's brand-new [AI](https://media.mmcentertainments.net) strategy, a national data library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to [AI](http://www.xysoftware.com.cn:3000) researchers.
+
In the US the future of federal rules to manage [AI](https://simplicity26records.com) is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
+
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of [AI](http://heksenwiel.org) with, amongst other things, companies in the [sector required](https://community.orbitonline.com) to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
+
But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the [AI](http://nebug.1c-hotel.online) sector to deal with less policy.
+
This comes as a [variety](https://open-gitlab.going-link.com) of claims against [AI](https://sennurzorer.com) firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
+
They claim that the [AI](https://jobiteck.com) firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.
+
The [AI](http://www.mad164.com) companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up [fair usage](https://innosol.tech) - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the [AI](https://learning.lgm-international.com) sector is under [increasing examination](https://maibuzz.com) over how it [collects training](https://www.immoprobycaro.com) information and whether it must be paying for it.
+
If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, [bytes-the-dust.com](https://bytes-the-dust.com/index.php/User:ZWCDel544651432) Chinese [AI](https://weplex-heatexchanger.com) [company DeepSeek](http://anneaker.nl) has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.
+
DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a [portion](https://gitlab.isc.org) of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.
+
When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for [wiki.piratenpartei.de](https://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Benutzer:Georgia7776) Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative [AI](https://gspdi.com.ph) tools for larger jobs. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so verbose.
+
But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly [slower human](http://heksenwiel.org) writing and modifying skills, are better.
+
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.
+
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
\ No newline at end of file